Our First Fear

Modern childbirth has saved countless lives. Advancements in medicine, hygiene and neonatal care have transformed what was once a dangerous passage into one with far more certainty and far less loss. Yet despite these triumphs, one assumption has gone almost entirely unexamined: that birth must be frightening, overwhelming and medically dominated. This belief is so culturally embedded that most parents never question it. Hospitals are designed around it. Guidelines anticipate it. Even the language of birth is steeped in urgency and threat.

​

But what if the most outdated part of childbirth is not medical at all? What if the way we bring human beings into the world is quietly teaching entire generations that life begins in fear?

Emerging research in perinatal psychology, developmental trauma and somatic neuroscience suggests that birth is not simply a medical procedure. It is the first major nervous system event in a human life. Long before thought or memory exist, the newborn registers pressure, separation, overwhelm and restriction as direct physical realities. These sensations form the nervous system’s earliest conclusions about whether the world is safe or unpredictable, supportive or frightening.

​

For years I carried a kind of fear that did not match the circumstances of my adult life. It was not until much later that I learned the story of my own birth. My mother had been haemorrhaging. I was cut out of her in an emergency procedure. We were separated immediately. Hours later, when the nurse finally brought me back to her, she told me that in those first moments she could not bring herself to see me; she never explained why, and I suspect she did not fully understand it herself. I do not blame her. She was traumatised and afraid, and her nervous system had entered its own survival mode. In that state, the body can misinterpret everything, even a newborn, as a source of threat. Without realising it, my mother’s system learned to fear the baby she had just delivered, and my own system, equally overwhelmed, learned to fear the person I depended on most. That moment, the first moment of my life, became the foundation of wounds I later struggled to understand: a fear of overwhelm, a fear of abandonment and a deep sense of rejection that seemed to appear from nowhere. Only when I began studying perinatal imprinting did those patterns finally make sense.

​

What I learned is that my history is far from unusual. Adults who struggle with a persistent fear of overwhelm often began life with a rushed or forceful birth, where the body learned that entry into the world meant being engulfed by intensity. Those who carry a deep fear of abandonment frequently experienced early separation from the mother. People who feel trapped or constrained in relationships often display the imprint of restriction in their earliest moments. These patterns are not personality traits. They are physiological memories held not in conscious thought, but in the tissues beneath the ribs and around the abdomen, where the first sensations of existence were recorded. This region, which houses much of the enteric nervous system often called the gut brain, plays a central role in emotional regulation. It is here that early sensory experiences are translated into the chemical and neural signals that shape our long-term responses to stress, safety and connection.

​

Research from institutes across Europe and the United States shows that the limbic and autonomic systems are already active during birth. Infants absorb stress hormones, environmental tension and the emotional states of caregivers. The nervous system, still forming, builds its first “operating system” from these impressions. This is not mystical thinking. It is biology. And it means that the earliest sensations of life can influence the entire arc of emotional development.

​

Yet our current birth model rarely accounts for any of this. In many hospitals, interventions prioritise efficiency over emotional grounding. Babies are separated from parents moments after birth. Bright lights, loud voices and rushed movements dominate the room. Parents themselves, conditioned to expect danger, often bring their own fear into the process. The newborn absorbs all of it.

​

The echoes often appear decades later.
Not as memories, but as patterns: hypervigilance, panic, a sense of being “too much,” or a persistent fear of being unwanted. These are not abstract psychological ideas. They show up in bodies that never quite learned how to feel safe.

None of this argues against medical intervention where it is needed. Modern obstetrics has saved lives and continues to do so. But the cultural assumption that birth must be inherently frightening has consequences. It influences how hospitals are organised, how staff are trained, how parents prepare and how newborns are welcomed into the world. And it reinforces a system where fear becomes the unspoken organising principle.

This raises a deeper and more uncomfortable question.
If fear is so thoroughly built into our childbirth paradigm, how did this become the norm? Why has a process that marks the beginning of human life been allowed to unfold in an atmosphere saturated with urgency and control?

​

There is no evidence that governments or medical institutions intentionally use fear as a tool. But when we examine how public systems evolve, the pattern is undeniable. Large institutions, including healthcare systems, tend to adopt structures that favour compliance and efficiency. Guidelines are written to minimise risk, avoid liability and maintain order in unpredictable situations. In this environment, fear becomes a kind of default setting. Not a conspiracy, but a consequence. Not a coordinated intention, but an inherited design.

Once embedded, these structures become self-reinforcing. Societies rarely revisit their oldest protocols. Policymakers are pulled toward more immediate crises. Parents are overwhelmed by the intensity of the experience. And so the foundational emotional environment of birth, the moment when a human nervous system forms its first impression of the world, remains largely unchallenged.

​

This omission matters. If we want to understand why anxiety disorders, hypervigilance and chronic nervous system dysregulation are rising, we cannot ignore the earliest chapter of human life. Fear experienced at birth does not stay in the delivery room. It is carried into relationships, decision making, stress responses and the ability to feel grounded in the world.

There is, however, another way. In countries and clinics where childbirth practices emphasise calm environments, continuous parental contact and reduced unnecessary intervention, researchers observe significant differences in early emotional development. When newborns remain in contact with a parent, when the room is quiet rather than chaotic, and when birth unfolds without unnecessary force, the nervous system forms markedly different conclusions about the world.

​

This is not sentimental thinking. It is grounded in decades of neurobiological and developmental research.

​

The argument is not that birth must be perfect. The argument is that the system should reflect what we now know about the human nervous system, rather than an outdated belief that fear and intensity are inevitable. If the emotional landscape of the delivery room shapes a lifetime of responses to stress, connection and safety, then it is reasonable to ask why our protocols have not evolved.

​

Parents deserve informed choice. Medical staff deserve systems that allow them to support emotional safety alongside physical safety. And newborns deserve an entry into the world that does not teach them, before they can speak, that life is something to brace against.

Birth is not simply a day in the life of a family. It is the opening chapter of a human nervous system. We can modernise our understanding of it. We can design systems that reduce fear rather than amplify it. And we can recognise that the first moment of life has a far longer reach than we have ever acknowledged.

​

The body remembers its beginning. And if we want healthier futures, we must start there.

​

To explore this work more deeply, visit SPIRITUAL TEACHING & MENTORSHIP >>  and return to the Articles hub for more resources.